Which better between Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 vs Tria?
If you’re in the market for a professional-grade laser hair removal device, you have to decide between two of the biggest names out there, Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 vs Tria.
Both brands claim to offer long-lasting results with little effort. But how do you choose between them?
In this article, we’ll provide an in-depth comparison of Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 vs Tria and help you make the best decision for your needs.
Comparison of Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 vs Tria
Ease Of Use & Comfort Level
Both the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 and Tria Hair Removal Laser 4X are designed to be user-friendly and extremely comfortable during use.
The Braun model has an ergonomic handle that fits nicely into the palm of your hand, making it easier to control when applying it to various parts of your body.
On top of that, its built-in cooling technology ensures that discomfort is kept at a minimum during treatment sessions.
Meanwhile, The Tria also boasts an easy to use design as well as excellent comfort levels due to its specific nozzle shape that efficiently cools down skin before delivering laser beams onto affected patches ensuring unparalleled safety during use.
Price
The price is one of the most important factors when it comes to choosing which device is best for you.
The Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 retails for about $400, while the Trio costs almost double that at around $800. This makes the Braun a more attractive option if budgeting is an issue.
However, keep in mind that prices can vary depending on promotions or sales so it is worth shopping around.
Design & Technology
The design and technology of each device also differ significantly.
The Braun has a curved handle which offers better handling accuracy while providing additional comfort during treatments than the straight handle of Tria’s model.
It also features ‘SensoAdaptTM’ skin tone detection technology which adjusts treatment strength automatically while simultaneously providing an even safer treatment experience than manual control offered by Tria’s model.
Additionally, it has five adjustable energy settings – which makes it versatile enough to suit different individual needs – compared to just three offered by Tria’s appliance.
Efficacy & Treatment Time
Both devices are considered equally effective at permanently reducing unwanted body hair following some sessions across 6-12 weeks.
However their treatment times vary. While using either product at their maximum setting will take about 2 minutes per area (e.g legs/arms).
Braun’s model can be used up to 3X faster with its ‘Glide Mode’ which enables practitioners to treat large areas quicker.
Making it suitable even for those with busy schedules who are always on the go!
On the other hand, due to its inability to auto adjust energy levels as needed (like what the Braun does) will require users of Tria Laser products use more time.
And effort in setting energy levels manually each session beforehand -making it less desirable proposition if time savings are crucial factor in deciding between these two options
Safety Features
Each device provides numerous safety features that meet all FDA requirements though they differ slightly too.
For instance – while both models feature skin type sensors accompanied by manual safety functions such as HPL counter and charge cycle reminders (alerting users when maximum usage has been reached).
Only Barmingham works developed sonic vibration feature that sanitises proprietary cooling tip after every use maintaining cleanliness & hygiene whilst treating clients .
Last but not least; Barmigham utilizes ‘LCD Screen Lock’ feature preventing misfiring accidents from happening further safeguarding safety both user & patient alike against unexpected burns from prolonged exposure or clashes with other skin types.
Conclusion
Overall, both products provide excellent results and safety aspects when used according with manufacturer’s recommendations.
Deciding between then – would greatly depend upon both individual needs and budget available.
Consumers who value time savings. As such may find Braum’s option quite appealing given its technological advantage for efficient treatments.
Albeit being slightly more costly than Tria particularly when taking into consideration overall cost overtime longevity wise.
Thought still offer good performance wise within price range available.